A teacher emails asking for pricing, and within a couple of replies you’ve asked how many pupils they have, what they use now, when they want to buy, who else is involved, what budget they’ve got, and whether they’ve thought about implementation. Every question makes sense from your side, although from theirs it can feel as though asking for a price has somehow turned into quite a lot of admin.

That’s the balance with qualifying school enquiries. You need enough information to know whether there’s a genuine sales opportunity developing, while the school may still be working out what it wants, what it can afford, who needs to be involved, and how quickly anything could happen.

Some of those answers will come easily, and others simply won’t exist yet. The trick is knowing what you need to learn now, what can wait until later, and how to keep the conversation useful enough that the school actually wants to continue it.

What does the school actually need?

A school asking for a demo or requesting pricing has already taken a small step towards buying. Maybe they have a contract coming up for renewal, a problem that keeps resurfacing, a project they’ve been asked to research, or a deadline that’s getting closer. Your first job is to find out what prompted them to get in touch, because that will tell you far more about the enquiry than the form submission itself.

A simple question like “What’s prompted you to look at this now?” will usually get you further than asking them to work through a list of qualifying questions. Schools tend to explain the situation in their own language, which gives you a much better feel for what they’re trying to fix, how long it’s been a problem, and how much attention it’s getting internally.

A head of department might tell you they’ve been talking about replacing something for two years, but staff have finally had enough of the workload it creates. A trust lead might explain that several academies are all solving the same problem in slightly different ways, and the central team has decided it’s time to bring some consistency to it. Those details start to tell you what kind of sale you’re dealing with and how much momentum already exists inside the school or trust.

They also give you a much better steer on what to talk about next. If the enquiry has come from a workload problem, spend your time on the parts of your product that reduce that workload; if the school is trying to create consistency across several sites, talk about how that would work in practice across those schools.

You’re learning how strong the need is, but you’re doing it through a conversation the school already has a reason to care about. That tends to give you better answers anyway, because people say far more when they’re explaining what’s actually going on than when they’re being asked to complete your sales process for you.

What do they know about the budget?

Asking a school what budget they’ve got can produce a surprisingly unhelpful answer, especially when you don’t know where they are in their budgeting cycle. “We haven’t got the budget for it yet” could mean the money hasn’t been allocated, they’re planning for a future budget, they need somebody else to approve the spend, or they’re still trying to work out what something like this is likely to cost.

The time of year can give you some useful context. Maintained schools work to an April to March financial year, with budget shares confirmed ahead of the new financial year, while academies are funded on an academic-year basis from September to August. Academies receive their main GAG funding in monthly instalments, beginning in September, although schools and trusts will usually be planning budgets well before the new funding period actually starts.

So a conversation in January or February might catch a maintained school while next year’s spending is being firmed up, while a conversation with an academy earlier in the year could be feeding into plans for the following academic year. There will also be departmental budgets, carried-forward funds, specific grants, and purchases that appear during the year, so there’s never one magical month when every school suddenly has money and starts shopping.

What you really want to understand is how this particular purchase fits into the school’s plans. Has money already been set aside for it? Are they hoping to include it in the next budget? Do they need a price before they can ask for the money, or have they already got an amount they need to work within?

That last situation is common enough to be worth remembering. A subject leader can be completely serious about buying from you and still need your pricing before they can walk into an SLT meeting and ask for £4,000, because “I’d like some money for a new resource” isn’t much of a budget request.

Your pricing can therefore help qualify the enquiry from both sides. If your typical contract is £15,000 and the school has £2,000 available, you want to discover that before two demos, three follow-up calls, and a lovingly produced proposal; equally, a school may have assumed your service costs far more than it does and suddenly find the purchase much easier to accommodate.

You’re trying to establish how far the school has got with funding the purchase, and what has to happen before somebody can actually spend the money. Once you know that, “we haven’t got the budget yet” becomes a much more useful answer.

What’s driving the school’s timescale?

A school might tell you that its current contract ends at Christmas. That gives you a date, but you still need to know what has to happen before then: whether notice needs to be given, when a replacement supplier would need to be chosen, who has to approve the change, and how much time they need for implementation.

That can bring the real deadline forward quite quickly. If they need to give their existing supplier three months’ notice, take a recommendation to SLT, and allow several weeks for setup and training, a December contract end could mean the buying decision needs to be made much earlier in the autumn term.

Other timescales will be driven by different things. A school may need a proposal ready for a governors’ meeting, want to spend an agreed budget before the end of the financial year, or be planning a new initiative for the next academic year.

Once you know what is creating the deadline, you can work out what the school needs from you and when. A supplier who knows there’s an SLT meeting next Thursday can get the pricing, case studies, or proposal across beforehand, while a school planning for next September may need a much slower sales conversation over the coming months.

That context also helps you decide when to get back in touch. If the school has already told you that SLT is discussing the proposal next Thursday, there’s no point emailing on Monday with “just checking in”; you already know when something is likely to happen, so follow up after the meeting unless they need something from you beforehand.

Who needs to be involved in the school’s decision?

School purchases have a habit of gathering people as they move along. A teacher can make the original enquiry, then their head of department gets involved, SLT wants to have a look, the school business manager asks for the numbers, and IT appears halfway through because somebody has finally mentioned that your platform needs connecting to something.

By the time a purchase is approved, the original contact may have brought several other people into the conversation, each with a different question and a slightly different reason for caring.

That’s why asking whether somebody is “the decision-maker” rarely gives you the full picture. A teacher may have no authority to sign the contract and still be the person who researches the market, narrows the options, recommends a supplier, and persuades everyone else that the purchase is worth making.

You’ll learn more by finding out how a purchase like this usually moves through their school. Ask who else is likely to want a look, who would normally approve the spend, whether IT or finance needs to be involved, and what your contact expects to happen once they’ve finished their initial research.

Multi-academy trusts can add another layer, because individual academies and central teams may have different roles depending on what is being bought. A trust lead might be researching on behalf of several schools, individual heads could still influence the final choice, and procurement, IT, or finance may join once the conversation becomes more concrete.

Knowing who appears next also tells you what your contact is going to need from you. If they’re taking the idea to SLT, give them something they can actually put in front of SLT; if finance is likely to be involved, make your pricing easy to understand, and if IT will have questions, get those answers ready before your contact ends up acting as an unpaid messenger between two inboxes.

What would happen if the school bought?

Once a school is seriously considering buying, there’s one very useful thing to establish: what would have to happen next for the purchase to actually go ahead? That question gets you out of vague enthusiasm and into the practical steps that can either keep the sale moving or quietly stall it.

You’re listening for things like ownership, timing, and internal dependencies. Who would take responsibility for getting it started? Does somebody else need to sign something off? Is there a particular term, training day, funding window, or delivery period they’re working around? Are there any internal jobs that need doing before they can begin?

Those answers can tell you a lot about how ready the school really is. A school saying, “Yes, we love it, but we need to speak to IT, check the budget with finance, and find somebody to lead it” still has several things to resolve; another saying, “The deputy head will lead it, finance has approved the spend, and we want to start after October half-term” is giving you a much clearer route to purchase.

That should change what you do next. If IT needs to be involved, bring them in before the sale gets held up by a technical question. If the school needs to hit a particular date, work backwards and tell them when a decision needs to be made; if nobody internally owns the next step, help your contact work out who needs to pick it up.

It can also expose problems before they turn into objections. A school may be happy with the price and convinced by the product, but still be worried about staff capacity, disruption, or simply finding the time to get everything organised. If you know that early, you can address the concern directly and show them what the path from “yes” to actually using what you sell looks like.

The point here isn’t to interrogate the school about delivery. You’re trying to find out whether there’s a clear route from interest to action, and if there isn’t, what needs sorting before the sale can move.

How much do you need to know right now?

There’s a temptation to fill every gap while you’ve got somebody on the phone, especially when your CRM is sitting there with a collection of empty fields making the opportunity look unfinished.

Some of those gaps will fill themselves as the school gets further into the purchase. The teacher may need to speak to their head before they know what funding is available, the head may need to involve the business manager, and the business manager may discover that the spend needs to go to SLT.

A week later, you suddenly know far more about the opportunity because the school knows far more about the opportunity too.

The first conversation may be enough to understand what they want to improve and why they’re looking now. A demo can bring other colleagues into the room, pricing may start a proper budget discussion, and a proposal can be the point where the internal approval process becomes clearer.

Trying to collect all of that during the first ten minutes can give you answers that sound useful while being based on very little. Somebody asked for a date, so the teacher says “September”; somebody asked about budget, so they say “probably around five grand”, and by the following week both answers have changed because they’ve finally spoken to the people who know.

Qualification works better when it keeps pace with the school’s own buying process.

What should you ask the school next?

The next useful question is often hiding inside the answer you’ve just been given.

If somebody says their current contract is ending, you’ll probably want to know when and what has prompted them to consider changing supplier. If they mention taking your proposal to SLT, there’s a natural conversation to have about what SLT will want to see, while a comment about several academies being interested opens up questions about how the trust expects to make the decision.

Following those little threads keeps the conversation moving without making the school feel as though you’re working your way through a qualification framework.

Experienced school salespeople tend to be very good at spotting them. They hear “we’ve been talking about this for ages” and wonder what has changed now, or they hear “the head asked me to look into it” and want to know what the head is hoping to achieve.

That curiosity gives you a much fuller picture of the sale, because the school ends up explaining how the purchase actually works in its own organisation. You still learn about need, budget, timing, people, and implementation, although the conversation follows the shape of the enquiry instead of the order of the fields in your CRM.

That difference is small from the supplier’s side and very noticeable from the school’s.

What should you do with the answers?

A school with a real need, agreed funding, and an SLT meeting in ten days probably deserves some attention now. Another school may be a brilliant fit for your product but still be four months away from discussing next year’s budget, which calls for useful follow-up and a little patience.

What you send should change as well. A teacher building support internally may need a short summary they can forward without spending half an hour rewriting your sales deck, while a school business manager might want clear pricing and a MAT could be much more interested in rollout, support, consistency, and how the numbers change as more academies come on board.

This becomes even more important when your marketing to schools is generating a decent volume of enquiries. A healthy pipeline can contain schools that are ready to move, schools that could buy later, and schools that were curious enough to have a look but have no active project behind them.

Treating all three exactly the same usually creates a lot of activity and a fairly unimpressive amount of progress. Your sales team ends up chasing people who have nothing new to tell them, while better opportunities receive the same generic sequence of calls and emails as everybody else.

Good qualification should help you decide where your time is most useful, how much support each school needs, and what would genuinely help the opportunity move forward.

Does the conversation still feel useful to the school?

By the end of a qualification call, you may know quite a lot about the school. You know what they’re trying to fix, who else is involved, roughly what they can spend, when they want to move, and what could get in the way.

The school should have learnt something useful too. Maybe they now understand what the project is likely to cost, realise they need to involve IT or finance earlier, have a clearer idea of the timescale, or know what they need to take to SLT.

That matters because school buyers are often trying to piece the purchase together while they’re speaking to suppliers. A good conversation can help them make sense of the next internal step, particularly when they’re still gathering information and working out how the purchase would actually happen.

If the call finishes with your CRM looking beautifully complete but the school still has exactly the same questions it had at the start, the balance has probably gone a bit wrong. Qualification should leave the school feeling that speaking to you helped move things along, even if the next step is simply that they now know who else needs to be involved.

That’s a much healthier way to qualify school enquiries, because the information you need tends to come more naturally when the conversation is genuinely helping the school make progress.

If you’re getting enquiries from schools but aren’t always sure which ones to prioritise, what to ask, or how to move them forward without overdoing the sales process, that’s exactly the sort of thing we can look at on a free education strategy call. We’ll talk through how you’re currently marketing and selling to schools, where enquiries are getting stuck, and what you could change to make more of the interest you’re already generating.

Tags
How to Sell to Schools How to Sell to Teachers Selling to Schools Selling to Teachers

Similar Articles

Free Guide to the Gatsby Benchmarks

Learn the eight Gatsy Benchmarks, and how they influence your edu-marketing strategies.

Read Post

VIDEO: Reductions and Restrictions - Cost of Living Special

Watch episode two of our new video series, in which we unpack how the cost of living crisis affects teaching, learning, and school spending.

Read Post